Like Daza mine are also 1, 3 and 5 .... and its really tough but it gets easier after a little while ... just listen to your heart as only you know what should be the size of your family :)
I found going from 2-3 harder than going from 3-4 :\: I know sounds odd but I found 3 more challenging than 4.....4's a breeze :\: ok no I just sound wierd....that's all the advice I have!
Lucky you guinness! I've got my work cut out for me trying to convince my husband to have a fourth. Twins the third time around would have negated the need for any convincing!
I've gone from 2 to 4 (always a risk!) but I love it. Great knowing that they will all have each other when they get older. And going from 1 to 2 was much harder than 2 to 4 for me.
My little ones are 1, 3 and 5. I have to say, three is a LOT more work than two but it's worth it. I love watching them interact and play together. It's harder to find individual time for them all but I grew up with three brothers and for me, the benefits of multiple siblings outweighs individual time lost.
Just come out from 'the other side' with first 2 children and the husband and I are deliberating about a third.
Need to hear some (positive) point of views from voices of experience.