Continuing problems raise fears of greater radiation threat | ExpatWoman.com
 

Continuing problems raise fears of greater radiation threat

787
Posts
EW GURU
Latest post on 16 March 2011 - 07:12

Tokyo (CNN) -- A fire was discovered Wednesday in the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant, the latest in a series of setbacks at the stricken plant that has heightened fears that the incidents could lead to widespread radiation contamination.

The fire followed a hydrogen explosion Tuesday at the plant's No. 2 reactor. Hydrogen explosions had previously occurred in the plant's No. 1 and No. 3 reactors.

Another fire had broken out Tuesday in the No. 4 reactor. While it burned, radiation levels at the plant increased to about 167 times the average dose, the International Atomic Energy Agency said.

That dose quickly diminished with distance from the plant, and radiation fell back to levels where it posed no immediate public health threat, Chief Cabinet Secretary Yukio Edano said.

Endless blocks of rubble in Japan

Japan nuclear crisis continues

Radiation and human health

Navigating a radiation cloud in Japan

Map: Fukushima Daiichi But the deteriorating situation and concerns about a potential shift in wind direction that could send radiation toward populated areas prompted authorities to warn people as far as 18.6 miles (30 kilometers) from the plant to stay inside.

"There is still a very high risk of further radioactive material coming out," Prime Minister Naoto Kan said, asking people to remain calm.

In all, the plant holds six reactors. At the time of Friday's 9.0 earthquake off northeast Japan and subsequent tsunami, Unit 4 was shut for maintenance and all fuel from the reactor had been moved to its spent fuel pool. Units 5 and 6 were also shut at the time of the quake, but both its reactors are loaded with fuel, the IAEA said.

About 200,000 people living within a 12.4-mile (20 kilometer) radius of the plant already had been evacuated.

Authorities also banned flights over the area.

200
Posts
EW NEWBIE
Latest post on 16 March 2011 - 16:53
me too, I feel the same. I feel that human race has failed again to establish an energy source that 's clean and safe. Imagine if all the money they spend to develop, build and install these nuclear plants would have been used for solar energy or other cleaner sources instead, we would all be able to use solar energy efficently by now. I bet you there is a very good lobby for nuclear energy somewhere...
481
Posts
EW EXPLORER
Latest post on 16 March 2011 - 16:18
When it comes to energy, Japan is resource poor. They have no oil and not enough land for wind or solar (I don't think solar is even an option at all, though wind might have been). I don't think that a country with such a high consumption rate (and no resources) can use anything other than nuclear (as an alternative to fossil fuels). One of their main issues has to be getting their consumption down first, other alternative energies couldn't provide enough to "feed" their need like nuclear can. Pretty sure they have thought through these options and even worst case scenarios before going to nuclear. Yes, they are earthquake prone, but remember these buildings are built to withstand the usual magnitudes that they deal with on a daily/monthly basis. I hate nuclear power in general, so not defending them at all. I just don't think their decision/reasoning is as obvious as we'd like it to be. :( I'm a bit depressed about it all to be honest.
648
Posts
EW GURU
Latest post on 16 March 2011 - 15:57
Considering Japan has 50 nuclear reactors which only provide 34.5% of Japan's electricity, I would say its not worth it. Wind, wave or solar energy would be better and a lot less harmful to the environment.
200
Posts
EW NEWBIE
Latest post on 16 March 2011 - 15:30
So what do you think about this? Isn't it terribly terrifying for Japan and for the whole world!! I was watching yesterday on CNN they were showing a map of location of nuclear plants by country. India has about 17-20, CHina 20ish, US over a 100, Canada 18. I'm really scared now about all these nuclear plants. WHat if a catastrophe like this would happen anywhere else? Why is the world not investing in clean energy instead, like solar energy? How can governments allow nuclear plant in an earthquacke zone!? Are we safe here, what happens if there is what they called a "total meltdown"??
238
Posts
EW NEWBIE
Latest post on 16 March 2011 - 07:31
Absolutely terrifying. Pity those poor families in the immediate danger zone, then pity the rest of country and in fact the world. I can't imagine what it would be like to have your children living with such a direct and deadly threat.
 
 

ON EXPATWOMAN TODAY