DS's nursery will not let him go for the next 15 days because his sister has chickenpox. DS doesn't have chickenpox (yet!), is it normal for a nursery to do this?
They are behaving in a totally responsible manner.
Your outrage shows that you are not.
Chicken pox can be extremely serious, and is at its most infectious before the rash appears.
And I sincerely hope for your work colleagues and adult friends that you have had it already and are not incubating the virus.
It can be fatal in adults.
edited by Livelytrish on 26/01/2014
It can be fatal in adults which is why the majority of people would prefer their children to catch chickenpox whilst they are children. There are millions of every day diseases which can occasionally prove fatal do you suggest that every sibling of every child with the common cold should be kept home in case somebody with a weakened immune system comes into contact with them? My elder daughter's school is aware that my younger daughter has chickenpox and they have not suggested that she stay off in case she is carrying the virus dormantly. I spoke to my paediatrician and explained the situation she thought it was ridiculous and was adamant they could not do this.
Please don't be ridiculous, I thought we talking about chicken pox, a potentially serious illness, not a cold.
And I suggest you change your paediatrician to one who has a better concept of communicable disease.
And perhaps it might have been wiser to ensure that your children had been vaccinated.
[b'>A cold has potential to kill, in someone with a weakened immune system it can turn into strep, flu, etc so what's the difference? Yes chicken pox can turn into a very nasty disease but so can countless other illnesses.
[/b'>
.
A cold cannot turn into flu as they are caused by different viruses.Neither can it turn into strep throat as that is a bacterial infection.
In my experience parents of children with a weak immune system and adults with weak immune systems take great care to avoid coming into contact with infectious diseases as it is often life threatening for them - they don't just go around hoping they wont catch something. It is more likely the unsuspecting, un-vaccinated who are at risk.
Not according to [b'>google and NHS online.[/b'> I think we're getting away from the point here, which is should siblings be forced to stay off school and nursery simply because they MIGHT carry a dormant illness?
Really?
http://www.nhs.uk/conditions/Flu/Pages/Introduction.aspx
do not rely on Google for medical information - there is a lot of rubbish out there.
DS's nursery will not let him go for the next 15 days because his sister has chickenpox. DS doesn't have chickenpox (yet!), is it normal for a nursery to do this?
They are behaving in a totally responsible manner.
Your outrage shows that you are not.
Chicken pox can be extremely serious, and is at its most infectious before the rash appears.
And I sincerely hope for your work colleagues and adult friends that you have had it already and are not incubating the virus.
It can be fatal in adults.
edited by Livelytrish on 26/01/2014
It can be fatal in adults which is why the majority of people would prefer their children to catch chickenpox whilst they are children. There are millions of every day diseases which can occasionally prove fatal do you suggest that every sibling of every child with the common cold should be kept home in case somebody with a weakened immune system comes into contact with them? My elder daughter's school is aware that my younger daughter has chickenpox and they have not suggested that she stay off in case she is carrying the virus dormantly. I spoke to my paediatrician and explained the situation she thought it was ridiculous and was adamant they could not do this.
Please don't be ridiculous, I thought we talking about chicken pox, a potentially serious illness, not a cold.
And I suggest you change your paediatrician to one who has a better concept of communicable disease.
And perhaps it might have been wiser to ensure that your children had been vaccinated.
[b'>A cold has potential to kill, in someone with a weakened immune system it can turn into strep, flu, etc so what's the difference? Yes chicken pox can turn into a very nasty disease but so can countless other illnesses.
[/b'>
.
A cold cannot turn into flu as they are caused by different viruses.Neither can it turn into strep throat as that is a bacterial infection.
In my experience parents of children with a weak immune system and adults with weak immune systems take great care to avoid coming into contact with infectious diseases as it is often life threatening for them - they don't just go around hoping they wont catch something. It is more likely the unsuspecting, un-vaccinated who are at risk.
Not according to google and NHS online. I think we're getting away from the point here, which is should siblings be forced to stay off school and nursery simply because they MIGHT carry a dormant illness?
DS's nursery will not let him go for the next 15 days because his sister has chickenpox. DS doesn't have chickenpox (yet!), is it normal for a nursery to do this?
They are behaving in a totally responsible manner.
Your outrage shows that you are not.
Chicken pox can be extremely serious, and is at its most infectious before the rash appears.
And I sincerely hope for your work colleagues and adult friends that you have had it already and are not incubating the virus.
It can be fatal in adults.
edited by Livelytrish on 26/01/2014
It can be fatal in adults which is why the majority of people would prefer their children to catch chickenpox whilst they are children. There are millions of every day diseases which can occasionally prove fatal do you suggest that every sibling of every child with the common cold should be kept home in case somebody with a weakened immune system comes into contact with them? My elder daughter's school is aware that my younger daughter has chickenpox and they have not suggested that she stay off in case she is carrying the virus dormantly. I spoke to my paediatrician and explained the situation she thought it was ridiculous and was adamant they could not do this.
Please don't be ridiculous, I thought we talking about chicken pox, a potentially serious illness, not a cold.
And I suggest you change your paediatrician to one who has a better concept of communicable disease.
And perhaps it might have been wiser to ensure that your children had been vaccinated.
[b'>A cold has potential to kill, in someone with a weakened immune system it can turn into strep, flu, etc so what's the difference? Yes chicken pox can turn into a very nasty disease but so can countless other illnesses.
[/b'>
.
A cold cannot turn into flu as they are caused by different viruses.Neither can it turn into strep throat as that is a bacterial infection.
In my experience parents of children with a weak immune system and adults with weak immune systems take great care to avoid coming into contact with infectious diseases as it is often life threatening for them - they don't just go around hoping they wont catch something. It is more likely the unsuspecting, un-vaccinated who are at risk.
DS's nursery will not let him go for the next 15 days because his sister has chickenpox. DS doesn't have chickenpox (yet!), is it normal for a nursery to do this?
They are behaving in a totally responsible manner.
Your outrage shows that you are not.
Chicken pox can be extremely serious, and is at its most infectious before the rash appears.
And I sincerely hope for your work colleagues and adult friends that you have had it already and are not incubating the virus.
It can be fatal in adults.
edited by Livelytrish on 26/01/2014
It can be fatal in adults which is why the majority of people would prefer their children to catch chickenpox whilst they are children. There are millions of every day diseases which can occasionally prove fatal do you suggest that every sibling of every child with the common cold should be kept home in case somebody with a weakened immune system comes into contact with them? My elder daughter's school is aware that my younger daughter has chickenpox and they have not suggested that she stay off in case she is carrying the virus dormantly. I spoke to my paediatrician and explained the situation she thought it was ridiculous and was adamant they could not do this.
Please don't be ridiculous, I thought we talking about chicken pox, a potentially serious illness, not a cold.
And I suggest you change your paediatrician to one who has a better concept of communicable disease.
And perhaps it might have been wiser to ensure that your children had been vaccinated.
A cold has potential to kill, in someone with a weakened immune system it can turn into strep, flu, etc so what's the difference? Yes chicken pox can turn into a very nasty disease but so can countless other illnesses.
I believe no other nurseries have this policy which has answered my question. Btw I made a choice not to vaccinate based on research and discussions with our paediatrician. I am shocked at your arrogance, to presume you know more than a doctor specialising in children's illnesses with decades of experience.
Believe me, not arrogance, merely deeply painful personal experience.......................and a considerable degree of medical knowledge.
But it's your decision, and you must make it based on your own sense of personal sense of responsibility towards others.
DS's nursery will not let him go for the next 15 days because his sister has chickenpox. DS doesn't have chickenpox (yet!), is it normal for a nursery to do this?
They are behaving in a totally responsible manner.
Your outrage shows that you are not.
Chicken pox can be extremely serious, and is at its most infectious before the rash appears.
And I sincerely hope for your work colleagues and adult friends that you have had it already and are not incubating the virus.
It can be fatal in adults.
edited by Livelytrish on 26/01/2014
It can be fatal in adults which is why the majority of people would prefer their children to catch chickenpox whilst they are children. There are millions of every day diseases which can occasionally prove fatal do you suggest that every sibling of every child with the common cold should be kept home in case somebody with a weakened immune system comes into contact with them? My elder daughter's school is aware that my younger daughter has chickenpox and they have not suggested that she stay off in case she is carrying the virus dormantly. I spoke to my paediatrician and explained the situation she thought it was ridiculous and was adamant they could not do this.
Please don't be ridiculous, I thought we talking about chicken pox, a potentially serious illness, not a cold.
And I suggest you change your paediatrician to one who has a better concept of communicable disease.
And perhaps it might have been wiser to ensure that your children had been vaccinated.
A cold has potential to kill, in someone with a weakened immune system it can turn into strep, flu, etc so what's the difference? Yes chicken pox can turn into a very nasty disease but so can countless other illnesses.
I believe no other nurseries have this policy which has answered my question. Btw I made a choice not to vaccinate based on research and discussions with our paediatrician. I am shocked at your arrogance, to presume you know more than a doctor specialising in children's illnesses with decades of experience.
Chicken pox has the potential to be very serious, Before the recent widespread uptake of the vaccine it used to cause death - in the USA it used to cause around 150 deaths a year. In my career as a nurse I have nursed adults with Varicella ( Chicken pox) encephalitis ( they often died) and neonates who contracted it from their mothers; the ones who contacted it early in pregnancy were left with quite bad congenital malformations.
For the un-vaccinated the risk is still there.
edited for typos
edited by Genie on 26/01/2014
<em>edited by Genie on 26/01/2014</em>
DS's nursery will not let him go for the next 15 days because his sister has chickenpox. DS doesn't have chickenpox (yet!), is it normal for a nursery to do this?
They are behaving in a totally responsible manner.
Your outrage shows that you are not.
Chicken pox can be extremely serious, and is at its most infectious before the rash appears.
And I sincerely hope for your work colleagues and adult friends that you have had it already and are not incubating the virus.
It can be fatal in adults.
edited by Livelytrish on 26/01/2014
It can be fatal in adults which is why the majority of people would prefer their children to catch chickenpox whilst they are children. There are millions of every day diseases which can occasionally prove fatal do you suggest that every sibling of every child with the common cold should be kept home in case somebody with a weakened immune system comes into contact with them? My elder daughter's school is aware that my younger daughter has chickenpox and they have not suggested that she stay off in case she is carrying the virus dormantly. I spoke to my paediatrician and explained the situation she thought it was ridiculous and was adamant they could not do this.
Please don't be ridiculous, I thought we talking about chicken pox, a potentially serious illness, not a cold.
And I suggest you change your paediatrician to one who has a better concept of communicable disease.
And perhaps it might have been wiser to ensure that your children had been vaccinated.
DS's nursery will not let him go for the next 15 days because his sister has chickenpox. DS doesn't have chickenpox (yet!), is it normal for a nursery to do this?
They are behaving in a totally responsible manner.
Your outrage shows that you are not.
Chicken pox can be extremely serious, and is at its most infectious before the rash appears.
And I sincerely hope for your work colleagues and adult friends that you have had it already and are not incubating the virus.
It can be fatal in adults.
edited by Livelytrish on 26/01/2014
It can be fatal in adults which is why the majority of people would prefer their children to catch chickenpox whilst they are children. There are millions of every day diseases which can occasionally prove fatal do you suggest that every sibling of every child with the common cold should be kept home in case somebody with a weakened immune system comes into contact with them? My elder daughter's school is aware that my younger daughter has chickenpox and they have not suggested that she stay off in case she is carrying the virus dormantly. I spoke to my paediatrician and explained the situation she thought it was ridiculous and was adamant they could not do this.
I'm with LT on this one.
Chicken Pox isn't just "one of those childhood illnesses".
It's far more serious than I was ever led to believe and I only realised just how serious it can be in the last 10 years.
I do sympathise with the inconvenience it can cause you though.
DS's nursery will not let him go for the next 15 days because his sister has chickenpox. DS doesn't have chickenpox (yet!), is it normal for a nursery to do this?
They are behaving in a totally responsible manner.
Your outrage shows that you are not.
Chicken pox can be extremely serious, and is at its most infectious before the rash appears.
And I sincerely hope for your work colleagues and adult friends that you have had it already and are not incubating the virus.
It can be fatal in adults.
<em>edited by Livelytrish on 26/01/2014</em>
Nurseries aren't regulated by the KHDA but by someone else - I think the Ministry of Social Affairs?
I do have a bit of sympathy for the nursery, chicken pox is very easily transmitted between kids of that age and can be very nasty (just because it often isn't, it's easy to forget how horrible it can be).
Also have a lot of sympathy for the mum though..... it's a difficult one
I know I'm furious. Could you imagine if we all had to keep our children off anytime anyone in the family was ill just in case they were carrying the illness dormantly (which is the reason I am being given ). My children would never be at school!
I haven't heard of that before. A couple of years ago my two oldest children had chicken pox two weeks apart. If their little brother had been unable to attend nursery due the same policy he would have missed a month of nursery. He didn't get the pox anyway, I'd have been fuming with a needless month off. Have they offered a pro rata refund as he's not actually ill himself?
DS's nursery will not let him go for the next 15 days because his sister has chickenpox. DS doesn't have chickenpox (yet!), is it normal for a nursery to do this?